Talk:Walter Sydney Adams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walter Sydney Adams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gravitional redshift validity[edit]

This page says Adams observed gravitational redshift in 1925. At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_experimental_errors_and_frauds_in_physics it says Adams' 1924 result was considered to be in error. Which page is correct? I'm not familiar with this subject. 76.152.182.21 (talk) 06:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the sentence about Adams, based on a book written in the 1960s. It seems that for some decades he was well known for that "discovery" and I was surprised it wasn't mentioned in the article. I didn't realize that the observations were later found to be incorrect. I'm going to change the sentence to say he "reported" the redshift, and that this was regarded at the time as significant confirmation of Einstein's theories, and that the observations were later found to be incorrect. PatConolly (talk) 08:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]