Talk:Washington State Route 276/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sometime soon. –TC N7 JM 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hatting discussion. Next time wait until the first reviewer finishes to leave comments. –TC N7 JM 03:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable[edit]

It is factually accurate and verifiable
Has an appropriate reference section Sainid (talk) 22:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

The sentence "the latter averaging up to 19,000 vehicles in 2011 according to a survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) measuring average annual daily traffic (AADT)" is confusing because I'm not sure if traffic is averaging 19,000 vehicles/year or 19,000 vehicles/day. It does include a link to the average annual daily traffic, but it would be helpful to have it explicitly stated. Sainid (talk) 22:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's per day. That's what average annual daily traffic means. I will begin a review of this later tonight. –TC N7 JM 23:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

located in the U.S. state of Washington flows better than located in Washington, United States.
- Fixed

Route description

In the second and third sentences, I'd change both uses of "in" to "at". I don't normally describe myself at being in an intersection, rather at one.
- Fixed
You know what? Maybe the other guy was right. Just using "19,000 vehicles" is a bit cryptic unless you somehow reword the sentence to mention AADT first.
- Fixed Sounder Bruce 03:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is going on hold for you to fix stuff. –TC N7 JM 03:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing the article. Nice job! –TC N7 JM 04:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]