Talk:Washington State Route 28/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 20:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Images

• File:Washington State Route 28.svg
  • The uploader is an active user, you can get rid of all of the assumptions on the page.
  • What's up with the blue lines?
    • Map has been replaced with an interactive version. For future reference, the blue lines are Interstates and freeways, as laid out in WP:USRD/MTF's color standards.
      • I think the new version is great. Thanks! Kees08 (Talk)
• File:WA-28.svg
  • The description says 24x24 inches, but the source page says 20x22 inches is the size in that range. I do not see any option for a square sign. Am I missing something?
    • The source lists 24" as the dimensions of the whole shield, rather than the silhouette, which I assume is the 20x22" figure. I'd have to ask the shield maker for clarification.
      • Yup I read it wrong. Thanks! Kees08 (Talk)
• File:Wenatchee and Columbia river - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg
  • Weird file name, probably don't need to move it.
  • What does "12q3 290" mean in the description?
    • It was carried over from the Flickr description. Not sure what it means.
      • Can you remove it then? And what does BNSF stand for? Kees08 (Talk)
        • Commons description has been re-written. For future reference, BNSF is the railroad name and stands for Burlington Northern Santa Fe (but it's officially known as BNSF now). SounderBruce 03:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

All license information and captions seem fine with the images.

Sources

• McDonald, Cathy (August 10, 2006). "Apple Capital Recreation Loop Trail". The Seattle Times. p. G13. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
  • Where did you get the page number for this?
    • I have access to The Seattle Times archive through a local library, complete with page numbers for the printed version.
• Google (August 18, 2018). "State Route 28" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  • Do we need that much Google in the citation?
    • It's generated by {{google maps}} and fills out all the available parameters.
• Soderberg, Lisa (June 1980). "HAER Inventory: Bridges, Trestles, and Aqueducts - Columbia River Bridge" (PDF). Historic American Engineering Record. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
  • Link is dead, but that is allowed per the GA criteria, just FYI
    • Added an archived link.
• Glanz, James (September 24, 2012). "Data Barns in a Farm Town, Gobbling Power and Flexing Muscle". The New York Times. p. A1. Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  • Date does not match up with article, does it have to do with online vs print?
    • This article was used to cite the existence of data centers, which is cross-referenced with the Google Maps citation for their location in relation to the town. I'd be happy to swap it out with a local source.

Sources are reliable, spot checked some of the information in the article and it matches the sources. Kees08 (Talk) 20:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

All of these are resolved. Kees08 (Talk) 03:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Prose

• "1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi"
  • Why is this in the table? Both mi and km are included as columns.
    • @Kees08: It's part of the agreed standard at MOS:RJL and I believe it's there to back up the two columns and their respective values. SounderBruce 22:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
      • I would love an RfC for this in the future, because having the conversion factors in there looks dumb when both columns already exist. Not your problem, if I get passionate about roads I may try to do one. Kees08 (Talk) 03:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

That's all I have for prose and MOS. Kees08 (Talk) 21:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)