Talk:Water resources management in Brazil

A fact from Water resources management in Brazil appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 576 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that only about 10% of Brazil's water resources is located in the southeast, the agricultural and industrial heartland of the country, where 73% of the population lives?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/April.

Wikipedia

Brazil: Government and laws High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as High-importance).

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil's storage capacity[edit]

It is hard to find data on storage capacity in Brazil. Any idea about the capacity to hold water of Brazilian dams and lakes in cubic meter ? Thank you!--anunezsanchez (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese translation[edit]

Thanks so much for the translation of the article into Portuguese! For some reason, the Portuguese version is repeated at the bottom of the English article, surely by mistake. Please correct, if possible.--Mschiffler (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]