Talk:Weaves (EP)

Weaves (EP) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 14, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Weaves (EP) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Weaves (EP) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 August 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the self-titled extended play of indie pop group Weaves combines elements of high-quality recording common in pop music with lo-fi noise music styles to create a "disgusting" yet "catchy" feel?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Weaves (EP).

Wikipedia

Canada: Music / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Weaves (EP)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MarioSoulTruthFan and I will be reviewing this article over the next days, please hold on any fixes until I say so. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Reference for Indie pop genre? Should also be in the composition
- Citation in composition section editorEهեইдအ😎 03:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

the other third having production from David Newfeld → re-word
- Fixed editorEهեইдအ😎 03:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should make a reference of each single, don' say only "EP was promoted with four singles,"
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The same goes for the music videos and do you know the name of the tour?
- The source I cited for the tour didn't really give the name of the tour, so I can't say. Named the music videos also editorEهեইдအ😎 03:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Production and composition[edit]

Flawless.

Promotion[edit]

"as the magazine described" → remove this part
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"strong voice." → end quote and then full stop.
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception[edit]

"Praises included the use and combination of many styles" → sounds too informal
- Fixed editorEهեইдအ😎 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"...band." → end quote and then full stop.
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"...chaos." → same as previous
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should mention Now magazine on the review part as well as Exclaim.ca just like the other magazines.
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing[edit]

All songs written and composed by Jasmyn Burke and Morgan Waters. → All songs written by Jasmyn Burke and Morgan Waters and produced by them excepted when noted. + add a source
- Burke didn't produce any of the tracks, so I'm not going to add "produced by them excepted when noted" in this case. Also added source.

Sorry, my bad. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel[edit]

Use {{spaced ndash}}
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of "source" → Credits adapted from liner notes of Weaves (EP):
- Done editorEهեইдအ😎 03:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Release history[edit]

Why two sources?

They're showing the album had both a CD and digital release. editorEهեইдအ😎 03:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Fine.

Overall GA review[edit]

@EditorE: I've completed the review, I'll put it on hold for a week, once you have adressed the issues I raised please ping me.

@MarioSoulTruthFan: All comments have been addressed. These reviews have been great and very useful in improving my other content as well.

Thanks, glad to see that I'm doing a difference here and there. Passing MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split proposal[edit]

Technically speaking, an album is not allowed to have an article at all until after the band that recorded it already have an article about the band — and overdoing the content so that the album's article is simultaneously serving as a quasi-band article is not an appropriate way around that condition. And the other problem here is that the band now have a Juno and Polaris nominated album under their belt. This article MUST be split so that the band content is in a band article instead of background in an article about an album whose creators don't actually have a band article at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]