Talk:Welara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWelara has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Welara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    No complaints

Pics[edit]

Dana, given that you have a photo of an Arab in this article, should there also be one of a Welsh pony? I suggest this one: File:Welshb shangri-la.JPG. Montanabw(talk) 04:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice image, I've added it in. Dana boomer (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That double image in one box trick is pretty cool! I hadn't seen that before and can think of many applications for it! Montanabw(talk) 01:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]