Talk:Welding defect

A fact from Welding defect appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that 32% of welding defects are from operator error?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Metalworking High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 4–8 September 2023.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Other defects[edit]

...that should be included: weld shape, spatter, and undesirable metallurgical changes, such as aging, grain growth, and transformations. Wizard191 (talk) 03:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How prevalent is this situation?[edit]

So....how many welds are defective (or what proportion of all welds is defective)? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the percentages ASME lists as welding defects adds up to greater than 100%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.40.41 (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lamellar tearing[edit]

If you feel it appropriate, do please add the Farrar, Dolby booklet published in 1972, which I considered citing earlier this evening and will be visible in View history. Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catherinecondie (talk • contribs) 20:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]