Talk:Werner Naumann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Herbert Lucht[edit]

In 1950, Werner Naumann joined in Düsseldorft the Belgo-German firm import-export Cominbel, whose owner is Herbert Lucht (died 1951) who was the head of Aussenstelle Wehrmachtspropaganda in Paris during the occupation.

This Herbert Lucht had married a Belgian adventurer Lea, called "Slissy", member of the Rexist party, she was employee of Otto Abetz in Paris, and she was, according to Joachim Joesten, a cousin of Leon Degrelle. In reality this Lea Lucht was born into a modest workmen family in Brussels, and bore the false title of countess and pretended to be the daughter of General and passed himself off as belonging to a illustrious family! Herbert Lucht was buried in the garden of his villa at Büderich, suburb of Dusseldorf. His widow Lea Lucht, alias "Slissy" stood at Meldorf breitem Weg Nr 2, in Schleswig-Holstein.

Bibliography regarding Herbert Lucht and his wife the false belgian countess said "Slissy".[edit]

  • 1949 - Prevent World War III, édité par, Society for the Prevention of World War III (New York), 1949.
  • 1953 - Joachim Joesten, Dr. Naumann’s conspiracy, pattern of the world-wide crypto-nazi plot, 1953.
  • 1953 - Neo-Nazi strength and strategy in West Germany, édité par American Jewish Committee, 1953.
  • 1956 - Alistair Home, Return to power. A report on the new Germany, éd. F. A. Praeger, 1956, pp. 166 et 412.
  • 1965 - Lev Bezymenskii, Auf den Spuren von Martin Bormann, éd. Dietz, 1965.
  • 1966 - Lev Bezymenskii, Tracing Martin Bormann, éd. Progress Publishers, 1966.
  • 1967 - Kurt P. Tauber, Beyond eagle and swastika: German nationalism since 1945, Wesleyan University Press, 1967.
  • 1968 - Wellington Long, The new Nazis of Germany, Chilton Book C°, 1968.
  • 1969 - Edward Frederick Langley Russel, Return of the swastika?, D. McKay C°, 1969.
  • 1969 - Yves van Domber (Pseudonyme de Cornelis Adrianus Antonius Koreman), Ik leefde met Martin Bormann, éd. Born, 1969.
  • 1974 - Ladislas Farago, Aftermath: Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich, éd. Simon and Schuster, 1974.
  • 1975 - Stan Lauryssens, Opmars naar het Vierde Rijk, Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij, 1975.
  • 1977 - Dieter E. Zimmer, Über Wolf Biermann, Verlag Europäische Ideen, 1977.
  • 1996 - Charles Whiting, The hunt for Martin Bormann: the truth, éd. Leo Cooper, 1996.
  • 1998 - Kevin Coogan, Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International, éd. Automedia, 1998.
  • 2001 - “Der Stenograf muss es wissen”, dans, Der Spiegel, 4/2001.[1]
  • 2002 - Otto Köhler, Monika Köhler, Rudolf Augstein: ein Leben für Deutschland, éd. Droemer, 2002.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nervius Secundus (talkcontribs) 13:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page has numerous problems[edit]

Dear Wiki Editors

My name is Guy Walters, and I am a historian. I am currently writing my PhD on Werner Naumann, and it is clear to me that this page is riddled with inaccuracies. How can I correct this page without having my changes reverted?

Best wishes

Guy Walters — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guywalters (talkcontribs) 13:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guy, as I explained on your talk page - User talk:86.138.139.222, you can't just revert when: 1) Your edit has been challenged per WP:RS and WP:BRD. I warned you as to violation of the 3 revert rule WP:3RR which can lead to being blocked and I see you have done it anyway. Please revert your edit. Per WP:BRD you are requested to discuss the matter here and reach a consensus with other editors.
First let me say, yes, the page can be improved and I welcome anyone's input to do it; with that said, one cannot make a claim based on some self-serving work WP:SPS and use twitter as a cited RS source, per WP:SOCIALMEDIA. If you have, and I assume you do, third party sources which support your position (and they would be considered RS) then those can be considered and with consensus they can be used. Kierzek (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But there's no proof that he went to Argentina! That's all a total fabrication by Jorge Camarasa. I shall expunge all that instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guywalters (talkcontribs) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Guy Walters[reply]

Well, I am glad you reverted your original edit, but wiping out an entire section is not ideal; but I will take your latest revision as a challenge to the position that he went to Argentina; something which was sourced to one book only; I would still like to see other third party sources to support your positon; but, I will not revert your latest edit at this time and await other editors imput on this matter; if anyone has RS cited information on this query, please post it. Kierzek (talk) 15:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One survivor[edit]

"One survivor, Bernt Engelmann observed the Zwangsdemokrat (forced democrat) was only pretending."

Survivor of what? Is this even English?

And appropriately enough, in the footnote Engelmann's first name is wrong.2A02:AA1:1612:5ECF:BD64:F37C:61E6:D2F9 (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promotions[edit]

"He was appointed head of the Propaganda Ministry by Führer Adolf Hitler in his last will and testament after Goebbels was promoted to Reichskanzler. "

Why "after"? Goebbels and Naumann were both designated for office by the testament. (And technically neither assumed office until Hitler was dead.) We can also do well without the "Führer".2A02:AA1:1612:5ECF:BD64:F37C:61E6:D2F9 (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]