Talk:Westcott railway station/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 06:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments:

Captions in sentences require full stops, see WP:CAPTIONS.
Where possible, treat years as a parenthetical, which requires a comma after it, see comma.
"Passenger trains generally served the station only on weekdays, although between 1903 and 1922 trains also ran on Sundays.[17] Although..." - Recast to eliminate double "although".
Notes, references and further reading need to be presented as headings, see WP:LAYOUT and MOS:APPENDIX.

Summary: There are a few minor issues that need to be rectified as listed above. Other than that, this article is close to GA standards. I will put the article On Hold for up to seven days, in which time I hope that these issues can be resolved.

Didn't we have this conversation last week? Full sentences in captions have full stops; sentence fragments do not, according to the MOS, and these are the latter.

I've split "further reading" to its own level 2 header. Regarding "References" needing its own header, I think you're misunderstanding WP:LAYOUT; the "Notes and references" section is the header as mandated by WP:LAYOUT, while "notes", "references" and "bibliography" are subsections within it and don't need their own header. This is absolutely standard layout at FA level; see Chelsea Bridge, Alice Ayres, Postman's Park, Bruce Castle… – iride scent 09:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments: Thanks for all your hard work! Everything looks fine now and all the criteria for a GA have been met. -- S Masters (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]