Talk:Wetwork

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2007-02-15 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found the following reference that may be used for sources: at http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/19/messages/445.html

WET WORK An operation involving the shedding of blood. KGB term. [Cf. _Mokryye Dela_, the KGB department of wet work --masakim's note] From _The Dictionary of Espionage: Spookspeak into English_ (1986) by Henry S.A. Becket.

wetwork noun An espionage assignment that calls for murder. [From _Wetwork_, a novel by Christopher Buckley] From _Trash Cash, Fizzbos, and Flatliners: A Dictionary of Today's Words_ (1993) by Sid Lerner et al.

No mention of the West?[edit]

Article seems to imply that only the KGB participated in assassinations. A ridiculous notion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.206.24.226 (talk • contribs) No, it's saying that's where the term originated. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wet - the video game[edit]

Just thought I'd mention the videogame Wet, which takes its name from the term 'wet work'. Don't know if it's worth adding to the article but I figured it's worth bringing up here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.62.15.10 (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

verb - mochit'[edit]

What about mentioning the verb 'mochit? Putin famously used it about Chechen terrorists - 'my ich zamochim v sortire'. Malick78 (talk) 12:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

use of the term in a presidential campaign[edit]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008. this is the head of the clinton campaign discussing wetworks, and specifying it doesn't mean pool parties in the vineyard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.207.96 (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a primary source. We'll have to wait for an actual mainstream news organization to report it. (they probably won't, considering the implications) 75.140.253.89 (talk) 22:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since there's no evidence Podesta used it in the sense of assassination, then it should not be here, especially as it's a primary source. Oberono (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]