Talk:What's Your Raashee?

What's Your Raashee? has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 19, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 29, 2017.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Priyanka Chopra (pictured) played twelve different characters, one from each zodiac sign, in the film What's Your Raashee?''

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2017.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18 February 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Previous copyedits:
/
	This article was copy edited by Miniapolis on 14 August 2013.

The new plot section[edit]

Hey, I think the new plot section (diff) is too long and unsourced. "plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words" (from mosfilm). I'll undo the diff if nobody disagrees here. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 16:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree --MK 14:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But the old one is too short (can't please everyone, huh?) Maybe I could take a stab at shortening it if you'd like. Bollyjeff (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticised for length[edit]

Is it because 3 hours 21 minutes makes this a short movie, by Bollywood standards? Excessive brevity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.248.88 (talk) 11:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha. It's explained under Critical Reception. BollyJeff | talk 12:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:What's Your Raashee?/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 14:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 14:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments up tonight. Please stand-by. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Looks good. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

"She tells him that a boy has agreed to marry her, but she is reluctan" — reluctant. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Sanjana shows Devu a picture; when he says something, she becomes angry and tries to leave." — says what? — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

The last four do not have role names. Either find out or, at best, remove them. Your call. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Character description

Can you include references which describe the traits of Chopra's characters? It would be better for those who may not know about the film. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More tomorrow. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Krish | Talk 20:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My second comment in the "Plot" section is not addressed yet. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes because that conversation is muted in the film. So, what do you want me to add what he said to her?Krish | Talk 07:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Production

In the plot, Harman's character, Yogesh, says he doesn't know his sign but in the casting section, you mention that Yogesh is Scorpio? Quite confusing there. Please clarify. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Sanjana asks Yogesh what's her raashee is. I think this was altered during the copy-editing.Krish | Talk 15:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack

"The vocals were performed by Sen, who appears on most of the songs" — Do you mean "renders"/"performs"? If so, either of those two would be better instead of "appears" unless he made an appearance in the song videos. If that is the case, you can list the songs where he makes his appearances in a footnote. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-worded.Krish | Talk 15:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Krish!: I'll look at the last three sections tomorrow. Really busy in real life. I apologise for the delay in my review. I'm usually never this slow. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

@Krish!: Couldn't find any fault with the last three sections. Great job! — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 14:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]