This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Haven't reviewed an article of yours in a while after you did spend a good amount of time away from Wiki and I will happily take this one on now! --K. Peake 17:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The song's production was" → "Its production was"
"It was released as the fifth single" → "The song was released as the fifth and final single" with the target, plus there should be a full-stop before this to end the previous sentence
Remove wikilink on Ginuwine
Not done --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The R&B track part should have "musically" removed and come before the sample info instead, plus change that to ""What You Know Bout" samples" with the target
Not done I meant merge these two parts as one sentence, plus remove the music journalists bit that you have added. --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Still Not done. --K. Peake 09:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"it showcases Pop Smoke sing about how he woos" → "Lyrically, it showcases Pop Smoke singing about his passion for" since that is more encyclopaedic
"It received positive reviews from critics," → "The song received generally positive reviews from music critics," with the target
You have not added the target. --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Still Not done. --K. Peake 09:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it not mentioned in the lead that his lyrics were praised as well as his singing range?
""What You Know Bout Love" peaked at number 25" → "It peaked at number 25"
"within the top five of five countries," → "within the top five of four other countries," to not only avoid repetition of info but repetitive wording
The certifications sentence is missing a full-stop
"of Pop Smoke and fans" → "of the rapper and his fans" to avoid stating his name too much
Retitle to Reception because there are accolades at the end
"the song shows that Pop Smoke" → "the song shows Pop Smoke"
"into multiple genres"." → "into multiple genres."" for consistency
"big to contain"." → "big to contain.""
"along with the album tracks" → "along with fellow album tracks" to be more specific
"even sometimes tender"." → "even sometimes tender.""
"In their album review," → "In her album review," because "their" implies it is the publication's staff or any other group/person who the genre of is unknown
The last two reviews should be in the first para instead since the second should only be for the two accolades; this number is not enough for a sub-section
"the song strayed Pop Smoke from his" → "the song strays from Pop Smoke's"
Not done, every song article always has the commercial section before the music video. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily, but this is not really offending anyone so you don't need to switch. --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"It has further peaked at number 7" → "It further peaked at number seven" per MOS:NUM
Remove over usage of "has". --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Still Not done. --K. Peake 09:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"It rose to number nine" → "The song climbed to number nine"
Cite Pop Smoke's chart history at the end of this sentence instead, as that verifies it being his third top 10 hit
"later rose to number 4" → "later rose to number four" and you should cite the chart from the table by using a ref name here instead, to avoid repeated refs
"The single peaked at number 16" → ""What You Know Bout Love" peaked at number 16"
This was implemented properly, but why did you merge the two paras when the number of sentences did not change? --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Still Not done for splitting the paras back to what they were before. --K. Peake 09:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"It was certified 2× platinum by" → "It was certified double platinum by"
"peaked at number 6 and was certified a platinum certification by the" → "peaked at number six and received a platinum certification from"
Remove "the" since Recorded Music NZ (RMNZ) does not have that at the start of their name like other certification organizations. --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Still Not done for the last point. --K. Peake 09:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Top five info should come before top 10 since not only are the positions higher, but the top five mentions New Zealand's fellow Oceania country Australia
Remove ref 30 per my earlier comment; it is basically a duplicate of the chart table's ref, to elaborate
You can replace ref 33 with ref 34, as they are the same and the former is cited from a URL not a template so a ref name can be used to replace it anywhere
On hold for a week since I know you are somewhat busy with other ventures currently; I have noticed that your skills as an editor have approved by a considerable amount though! --K. Peake 08:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review Kyle! All of your issues have been addressed. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Ultimate Boss You missed a few points, which I covered above but thank you for the quick response. --K. Peake 09:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Ultimate Boss I fixed the reference for you and added its status as a dead URL, plus thank you for implementing the suggested changes even though I did some copy editing in the lead where my suggestions seem to have come across as confusing to you. ✓Pass and I did remember to fix the target for music critics as well! --K. Peake 17:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]