Talk:Whitley Furniture Galleries
Whitley Furniture Galleries is currently an Economics and business good article nominee. Nominated by Johnson524 at 14:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Former furniture retailer in North Carolina |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Whitley Furniture Galleries appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by DirtyHarry991 talk 00:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Whitley Furniture Galleries would increase the population of Zebulon more than eight-fold when hosting an automobile giveaway in 1936? Source: Source
- ALT1: ... that Whitley Furniture Galleries closed after 113 years of business only because of a lack of a fifth generation to run it? Source: Source
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jet Lag: The Game
Created by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Whitley Furniture Galleries; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article is new enough and long enough, and is well sourced. QPQ done. Earwig didn't flag anything, and a spot check of paywalled sources showed no issues. (@Johnson524: - this doesn't affect the DYK nom, but zebulonbuildings.com appears to be offline. If there's any way to find archived copies of those documents you have sourced to it that'd be great for future access.) The hooks are interesting, though the source for ALT0 that I was able to access says an estimated 8 to 15 thousand attendees. "Up to fifteen fold" is therefore accurate, but that's a big difference between the low and high ends of the estimate. The article also says the population was "increased ten times over", so that discrepancy makes me hesitant to sign off on the present wording. ALT1 is sourced and in my opinion a little more interesting, so it is my preference. However, I'd prefer a wording change from "would close" to "closed".
- With all of that said, this is my first DYK review, so per the instructions for new reviewers, I'd be appreciative of a second set of eyes on this to make sure I covered all bases before marking it good to go, thanks! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @DrOrinScrivello: Thank you for the review! For your first one, this was very detailed and well organized, so well done 🙂 I'm taking your advice and changing "would close" to "closed," and archiving all 18 sources on the page to prevent further link rot. As for your concerns about ALT0, I figured including "up to" in front of the top estimate could work, but I've toned it done to just "more than eight-fold," as there is a pretty large gap in estimates like you pointed out. Hope this addresses your concerns and thank you again, cheers! Johnson524 03:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @DrOrinScrivello: Review looks good, though you should say something about whether the article is written from a neutral point of view, especially when the article is about a business. From a quick skim, nothing in the article or blurbs makes me think this is non-neutral or promotional, just some cool history of a small town. Looks good to me. If you're happy with the modified blurbs above, you're welcome to approve the submission. — Wug·a·po·des 18:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Good advice, I'll remember that. And @Johnson524: thanks for the kind words as well. The changes look good to me, this is good to go! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 20:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Whitley Furniture Galleries/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Johnson524 (talk · contribs) 14:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 17:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Reconrabbit, and I'm going to be reviewing this article. Please give me some time to complete a source check following the start of this review - I'll be making some minor tweaks to the article to get it in line with the WP:MOS, but there will probably be a few things that I'll ask you to address before the close. Reconrabbit 17:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Reconrabbit: Thank you so much!! This article is mostly cited using newspaper clippings acquired from Wikipedia Library, and at least one of the citations had died since I wrote the page, and can only be accessed through the archive link. Because of these reasons, I am so grateful you decided to still review the page 😄 To access any of the newspaper clippings for free, replace the beginning of the url with "https://www-newspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/". Cheers! Johnson524 03:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
All eight buildings part of the galleries
: A little awkward phrasing. Were there other parts of the galleries that weren't buildings? Can this be clarified?"R.J. Whitley as the owner/president"
: Was he both owner and president? What's the intended title?In regards to the companies their products were from: smaller and local companies were often chosen, but some larger brands including Barcalounger, Bassett Furniture, and La-Z-Boy were also offered.
: Something about this is off. It might be better to completely omit the "In regards to..."Some services the business offered were included complete interior design
: Is "included" or "were" the intended word to start this short list?this number later grew to where product departments with individual managers were later needed
: It might help to clarify that "this number" refers to the amount of salesmen employed.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
The duo
: I don't know if this fits into the encyclopedic style.- The "Closure" heading can get lost in the text because of how small it is. I would recommend making it sub-heading level 1 instead of 2.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Any further broadening of the scope of this article would probably require the use of less reliable resources such as press releases, etc.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Any historical images of the location or R.J. Whitley would be great for this article, but the addition of such are probably out of the scope of this review.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Source Checks:
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
This states that "The store is holding a sale until all of its warehouses are emptied of the remaining furniture," but not that the product was gone by late February, unless that's in the video that I can't watch without having an account. - [15]
- Pass or Fail:
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- B-Class home articles
- Low-importance home articles
- WikiProject Home Living articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles