Talk:Wikipedia Watch

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

delete, 20 November 2009, see discussion.
keep per WP:SNOW/Withdrawn, 16 October 2007, see discussion.
speedy keep, 21 June 2007, see discussion.
merge, 18 April 2006, see discussion.
no consensus, 23 October 2005, see discussion.

This redirect was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion review on 9 January 2010. The result of the discussion was overturn and restore.

This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request on the basis that: overturned at DRV. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits.

Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely.

Old article[edit]

The old article under this name was deleted in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wikipedia_Watch_(5th_nomination)

Redirect target change[edit]

{{editrequested}} Uncontroversial edit: point the redirect to the only section in the target article that mentions the website: Criticism_of_Wikipedia#Privacy_concerns. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Normally, you don't comment just to agree, but protected edit requests need to be supported by consensus. Brian Jason Drake 13:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Nsk92 (talk) 14:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redirect[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

This needs to be updated: Wikipedia#Privacy

Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Dabomb87 (talk) 18:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 13 September 2013[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Uncontroversial/technical: needs to redirect to Criticism_of_Wikipedia#Privacy_concerns once again. The information that prompted the last target change has been deleted. Brycehughes (talk) 22:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 4 July 2022[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Please add the {{R to section}} template to the redirect. 🇺🇦 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]