This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
He did get the crap end of the deal. I mean, the poor fellow had to write about the events of the game... which is a game...
Hoping redemption comes in the form of Mass Effect =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.139.31.1 (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It really didn't. Indeed, since Bioware issued a public apology about the poor quality of Dietz's Mass Effect novel and learning disability advocates criticised his misrepresentation of autism in the book, I'd suggest the matter is notable enough to warrant a "Controversy" section. 51.7.192.166 (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
