Talk:William E. Russell (politician)

William E. Russell (politician) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 28, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: Massachusetts / Governors High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:William E. Russell (politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bill McKenna (talk · contribs) 01:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very good article about a 19th century Governor of Massachusetts. I reviewed it for accuracy and complete, encyclopedic content. It is informative, and has a neutral tone. The sources are reliable, and I could find neither evidence of plagiarism nor copyright infringement. There are frequent, verifiable inline citations. I believe this article meets all criteria for a GA per Wikipedia guidlines. Bill McKenna (talk) 01:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bill McKenna:, is there going to be more of a review, or are you going to close this? Magic♪piano 15:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]