Talk:William Martin (Royal Marines officer)

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Biography: Military Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Incomplete[edit]

Nothing to indicate exactly what they did to the body -- military uniform, bogus papers in pockets, whatever else -- to fool the Germans. Jackmingo (talk) 08:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of the link to Operation Mincemeat? Tommy Pinball (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glyndwr Michael. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615061830/http://www.cwgc.org/search/certificate.aspx?casualty=4041661 to http://www.cwgc.org/search/certificate.aspx?casualty=4041661

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Known for a single event[edit]

If anybody is known for a single event, surely it is Michael. Unlike most other questions of interpretation of WP:ONEEVENT about whether someone qualifies for a separate article or not, one can safely say without fear of contradction that not a single thing Michael did during the entire course of his life qualifies under the WP:GNG for sufficient notability to merit an article. It is literally only his corpse and what happened to it which has notability. This raises a question about how this article should be entitled. See, for example, Sandra Bland. Mathglot (talk) 20:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page move?[edit]

I would agree with the comments above; I would also suggest that it offends our policy on neutrality to state categorically that Glyndwr Michael was "The Man Who Never Was", when there is some doubt on the matter.
Therefore I suggest moving this article to "William Martin (Royal Marine officer)", who I suggest is notable ( both for his part in Operation Mincemeat and for the media coverage surrounding his identity), and re-focus it, adding some detail about "him", and about the alternate theories of his identity, to go with the Glyndwr Michael stuff. If there are no objections I will do this in a couple of weeks. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done (finally!) I trust everyone is OK with that, Xyl 54 (talk) 00:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Birth Year[edit]

The headstone quotation gives his birth year as 1907 but the article gives 1909. So either the headstone is wrong, it's a typo, or the birth year given in the article is wrong. Froglife94 (talk) 17:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the article say 1909? And the headstone is correct; Martin's birth year (as shown on his identity card) was 1907. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Martin[edit]

A problem with accepting the above named as the third candidate (after those surnamed Michael and Melville) for the "Man Who Never Was" is that no sailor called Thomas or Tom Martin is recorded as lost from H.M.S. Dasher by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, who, were his body never found for burial, would be listed as a "No Known Grave" case. No other vessels were involved as victims of the Dasher incident. The CWGC website lists 6 plain Thomas Martins from WWII but all have their ships accounted for. Any published source that names a Tom Martin as a victim of the incident is therefore likely to be wrong.Cloptonson (talk) 15:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]