This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
– No indication that subject's notability in the English-speaking world or even in his own constituency was at a level sufficient for elevation to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. His entry appears in no other Wikipedia and, also, the pilot seems to have been known as simply William McMullen rather than by his full name, William Stuart McMullen. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 14:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly oppose Primary topic is determined by relative notability -- there is not such thing as being "sufficient for elevation." Pages do not need to meet some kind of arbitrary standard of how important they should be before becoming the primary.--Yaksar(let's chat) 01:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since every {hndis} page has entries which receive more page views than other entries on that same dab page, if "relative notability" were to be the key consideration in the selection of a dab page WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, then every dab page would have a primary topic and all the entries would be listed in order of page views, which may vary on a day-to-day basis.
As for meeting "some kind of arbitrary standard", as we all know, most dab pages have no primary topic because the standard for selection of a primary topic tends to be set fairly high in terms of national or international prominence beyond the narrow confines of the single dab page in question.
The "strong oppose", rather than simply "oppose", appears to argue that this Irish political figure, whose political career ended in 1953 and whose entry has not been picked up by any other Wikipedia, must be such an obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC that if it wasn't one already, it would unquestionably pass a nomination for primary. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 15:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, William McMullen gets an average of just 3 page views per day and the RCAF pilot is also referred to as just "William McMullen" in the cited sources, so this seems like a sensible move to me. The other two dab page entries get more views but I don't think they warrant consideration here, "Rodney" being apparently known by his middle name and "Billy" being named Wilbur rather than William. PC78 (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - no clear primary topic. (3 page views a day? Yikes.) Move disambiguation page to basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
