Talk:Wilson ProStaff Original 6.0

Tennis Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

On this "Speedy Deletion"[edit]

The article "Wilson ProStaff 6.0" is not an advertisment for any external link or third party. I am not affiliated with any of the external links that are posted in the article and would not profit from any revenue from the alleged advertisment. The article was a simple page for the Wilson ProStaff 6.0, if not the best tennis racquet ever produced. If it is the externals links that are the problem (since they redirect to Tennis Warehouse) I will promptly remove them from the article. In all fairness, the pages provided were for statistical use as opposed to advertisment/profit as I am not affiliated with Tennis Warehouse.

Prod[edit]

I think it will be fair enough to remove this prod and keep the article. — Deckill e r 05:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to discussion forum as a citation?[edit]

It seems highly unusual for a web forum post written with pseudonyms (Talk Tennis on the Tennis Warehouse site) to be used as a citation, particularly given that thorough articles (not blog posts nor forum posts) have been removed as citations in the past under the claim that their authors aren't notable enough. 107.77.206.126 (talk) 04:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]