Talk:Wind power/to do

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Per Wikipedia guidelines, this entire Wind Power writeup should be edited to be from a Neutral perspective, rather than its present promotional status.

MensaPhysicist (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The criticism on the bottom up method for seems to be itself flawed and invalid (see reference below). The 2005 analysis by Archer et al. seems to be correct and this should be made more clear in the article.

Comment on “The problem of the second wind turbine – a note on a common but flawed wind power estimation method,” by F. Gans, L.M. Miller, and A. Kleidon (Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., 1, 103114, doi:10.5194/esdd11032010, 2010)