Talk:Wittgenstein's ladder

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Analytic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Analytic philosophy

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Lie-to-children was copied or moved into Wittgenstein's ladder with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Sentence Construction Unfinished.[edit]

The following sentence, from the second paragraph, seems to me a work in progress: "Among what can be said for Wittgenstein are the propositions of natural science, and to the nonsensical, or unsayable, those subjects associated with philosophy traditionally- ethics and metaphysics, for instance."

There is a failed parallelism here. Are there two things that can be said for Wittgenstein, the sayable and the unsayable? If so, the "to" is superfluous, indeed destructive. Or are the propositions of natural science sayable but the author forgot to supply a verb for the nonsensical or unsayable in a second, at present rather dangling, clause?

On the assumption that the author intended to continue Wittgenstein's faint irony, with the unsayable being said before being discarded, I would suggest the following two simple edits:

"Among what can be said for Wittgenstein are the propositions of natural science, and the nonsensical, or unsayable, those subjects associated with philosophy traditionally -- ethics and metaphysics, for instance." This deletes the intrusive "to" and cleans up the en-dash.

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Given the preceding problematic at work in his Tractatus,"[edit]

I don't know what 'problematic' means here. Dependant on what that means, I think it might also be an issue what 'preceding' refers to - the article is very much non self-contained and relies on unlinked-to prerequisite knowledge.2A01:C22:34C3:D700:2577:8161:6310:C02A (talk)