Talk:Wojciech Kossak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I removed the gallery of his artwork, per WP:NOT. There's already an external link to a gallery of images. It might make more sense to have a list of the battles that he painted and include the art work in those articles instead. howcheng {chat} 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wojciech Kossak.jpg[edit]

Image:Wojciech Kossak.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible photo to add?[edit]

Could this photo be added or is it in the public domain?

http://www.krakow.travel/upload/postacie/kossak-wojciech.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.182.3 (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caption for Kossak's Olszynka Grochowska[edit]

The caption says "ca. 1931" although in the picture itself, just below the signature, the year 1886 is clearly visible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bavafra (talkcontribs) 19:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]