Talk:Women's Barracks

A fact from Women's Barracks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Women's Barracks (cover pictured), regarded as a classic of lesbian pulp fiction, was banned in Canada and became the first paperback-original bestseller in the United States?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women's Barracks.

Wikipedia

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Culture / European / French C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Original 1950 cover

... that Women's Barracks (cover pictured), ~~considered~~ regarded as a lesbian pulp fiction classic, was banned in Canada and became the first paperback-original bestseller in the United States? Source: https://www.salon.com/2005/08/09/torres_3/ "quickly became the first paperback original bestseller" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/culture-obituaries/books-obituaries/9566294/Tereska-Torres.html "It was banned in several American states and in Canada" https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-55861-494-9 "this reissue of a long out-of-print 1950 classic,"

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kathy Arendsen

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 11:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting book with a history, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and almost a must ;) - I wonder if we have to say lesbian in the hook, vs. leaving it open to please find out why banned but a bestseller? What do you think? ... rather mention banning in some states of the US? ... pointing at how divided that country is? - If leaving it in, I think "regarded as" might be clearer than "considered" - I wondered what the barracks considered. - In the article, you don't need a ref for any fact sourced in the body, I don't need more than three refs for one fact, and I like them in numerical order. How about an infobox? Just suggestions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Gerda Arendt! Here's an alt with lesbian removed:

ALT0a: ... that Women's Barracks (cover pictured), regarded as a classic in its genre, was banned in Canada and became the first paperback-original bestseller in the United States?

—valereee (talk) 12:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:multiple citations -- sometimes there are assertions within in a single sentence that are from different sources, so usually they're all necessary. Sometimes I feel like an assertion is exceptional enough that it needs multiple RS saying the same thing. Re:ordering. I prefer that, too. I generally don't bother until I feel like I'm mostly finished, because they just get out of order again, but I can reorder them now! —valereee (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all. I approve both now. If the image is not taken, I'd go for the original, otherwise I think the image speaks better than words, and we might even drop the "classic" bit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also added an infobox; I'm neutral on them but in this case I think it's helpful —valereee (talk) 14:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to promoters: I'm waiting on an interlibrary loan and would love to hold off a while, if possible. If you need to schedule it, that's fine! —valereee (talk) 15:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee: where is this holding? Can it be promoted yet? Yoninah (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yoninah, if you need to promote, go ahead! I've got an interlibrary loan in transit, but that information can be added later. It's not crucial. —valereee (talk) 19:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]