This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
I preferred the Women's March on Seattle with the call-out to Womxn's March. Unless someone can share a few sources and convince me differently. Jaldous1 (talk) 18:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Answering my own question. I see both, so added that in. Jaldous1 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think we usually say "styled as" for uncommon or deliberate misspellings. Example: Ignite (game engine) not IGNITE. But the WP:COMMONNAME guideline is concise: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." The article title here should be exactly what is the most common usage in the media now. - Brianhe (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So, you're advocating for the title "Women's March on Seattle"? I think this would be best, since "Womxn's" is a stylization. ---Another Believer(Talk) 19:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I should have said that I prefer the original title, Women's March on Seattle. Ghit counting is not the end-all but we do have these results that support it.
Women's March on Seattle 56,500
Women's March in Seattle 36,700 and I think many of these are just a phrase not the actual title of the event
Womxn's March on Seattle 18,000
The 'x' in the name doesn't seem to belong in the WP title. - Brianhe (talk) 19:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So, shall we move back to "Women's March on Seattle"? ---Another Believer(Talk) 19:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just adding one other thought. There might be a WP:ACCESSIBILITY issue with screen readers, and definitely a searchability issue with the spelling including the spurious 'x'. - Brianhe (talk) 19:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm for returning it to "Women's March on Seattle". (And I despise the Wikipedia-specific phrase "stylized as" — it seems contrived and seems like a cop-out for people who worship marketing over English. "Also spelled as" or something?) --Closeapple (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this information belong on one of the parent Women's March articles, and not the Seattle-specific article? Let's keep this page on topic. ---Another Believer(Talk) 17:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Probably so; there was only Seattle and a D.C. specific article when I started this one. - Brianhe (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I like seeing regional inclusion here. I would expect them to also be on the D.C. article.Jaldous1 (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't found a mention of it in media--but I know someone who saw an event in Issaquah. If anyone comes across a reference it would be great to include. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaldous1 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe these folks who chartered buses from Issaquah to Judkins [1]? - Brianhe (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Local media is already rearing up for Saturday's march[2] and even looks like some counter-protesters will be showing up as well. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}