Talk:Write on Me/GA2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 05:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since I failed this previously, I feel responsible to review it again. I will have my comments up shortly. Aoba47 (talk) 05:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox

The references in the lead are not necessary. Non of the information being cited is controversial, and all of it should be present in the body of the article with the sources anyway. Please remove all of the references. As for the infobox, the references are fine, as I have seen users go either way about that particular issue.
I do not believe the word “Musically” in the first paragraph is necessary as it does not add much to the sentence.
For this part (the track is a mid-tempo tropical house number), I would change “the track” to “it” to be more concise.
You have Kygo linked twice in the first paragraph. I would also either remove the descriptive phrase in front of the second instance of Kygo (i.e. Norwegian DJ) or move it up to the first instance in which you mention him.
For this part (that uses synths, tambourines, an acoustic guitar and finger-snaps in its instrumentation), put a comma after “guitar”.
Rephrase this sentence (Inspired by the lack of ballads on their previous records, the group wanted to create more variety and a different atmosphere that the group had not showed listeners before on this track.) to avoid the repetition of the word “group”.
In the second paragraph, I would add a descriptive phrase in front of Cabello to make it clear that was a member of the group at the time.
The word “release” is repeated three times in close succession in the second paragraph.

Background and release

Make it clear that Cabello and Brooke are members of the group.
I would link Fifth Harmony on its first use as it is the first time you mention them in the body of the article.
I would change this sentence (This was something that was not very present in their debut album, Reflection (2015), she recalls, which she and her bandmates challenged.) to (She recalled that this type of material was not present on their debut album, Reflection (2015), and she and her bandmate wanted to change it.).
For this part (When the group revealed the tracklist on May 6,), include the year. Also “tracklist” should be “track list”.

Composition

For this part (Music critics characterized the song), please link “Music critics” to music criticism.

Critical reception

Please add ALT text to the image
I would add more structure to this section. This appears more like a listing of quotes from various critics rather than a cohesive narrative. I would organize by topic if possible. Please refer to this resource to see what I mean.
Unlink Kygo as he was linked in a previous section.
Digital Spy should be in italics.

Music video

This part (6 May 2016) should be (May 6, 2016) to match with most of the dates are shown in the article.
Please revise (the member Normani Kordei) to (member Normani Kordei) and link her.
This part (She elaborates this by stating) should be (She elaborated this by stating).
In this part (After her verse, the camera moves to Camila dancing in a sensual way. A close up of Lauren is then shown with a dark silhouette of Cabello abruptly switching between takes.), please be consistent with how you reference Camila Cabello. Since you primarily use last name, I would advise to stick with last names.
Use Lauren’s full name when you first mention her and add the link for her.
Please add ALT text to the image. And complete the “Media data and Non-free use rationale” box for the image.
Were there any reviews for the music video?

Final comments

Good work on this. Once my comments are addressed, I will pass this. Have a wonderful day or night. Aoba47 (talk) 06:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

Failing as the nominator has not responded to my comments after several weeks. Good luck with this in the future! Aoba47 (talk) 06:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.