Talk:Wyvern Light Car

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it WAS a badly written stub (internet crash / confusion) about a legitimate British car manufacturer, as notable as most other early manufacturers that were terminated when WW1 changed the world. The idea that it may 'not be notable enough for an encyclopedia' is particularly idiotic - as the quoted source is an encyclopedia. I have now added another encyclopedia ref which I hope is sufficiently encyclopediaic to satisfy this criterium. (your reason here) --Chienlit (talk) 06:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the CSD tag as the presence of a reliable source that verifies anything about the subject is sufficient to clear the criteria. The nominator is new and has had a few other speedy tags declined, so I wouldn't worry too much about this - an admin always has to double check the tag. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]