Talk:XLCubed

Created a XLCubed wiki page to show neutral company background of XLCubed vs the other wiki pages on similar companies as a significant and important data visualization and analytics vendor.OLAPUser (talk) 11:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page created in similar style and content to similar companies e.g. Cognos, Panorama, MicroStrategy etc. Which are valid pages hence XLCubed page is valid and should not be deleted.OLAPUser (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the article is in a similar style to others is irrelevant: what is relevant is whether the article shows evidence that the company is significant enough to warrant an article. At present it doesn't. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank-you for the clarification on criteria. If the article is amended to show the company is significant in its technology sector I assume that this would then warrant the keeping of the article? OLAPUser (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OLAPUser posted the same question on their talk page, and I have replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try to tidy up this article a bit and add some resources, because I use XLCubed quite frequently and think it's a worthwhile article. Ant (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XLCubed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110930195708/https://solutionfinder.microsoft.com/Partners/PartnerDetailsView.aspx?partnerid=516061cab3354d68b7cba789513d0785 to https://solutionfinder.microsoft.com/Partners/PartnerDetailsView.aspx?partnerid=516061cab3354d68b7cba789513d0785

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]