Talk:XTS-400

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the XTS-400 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Monolithic Kernel[edit]

I cannot find any documentation either way, but the idea that this system is monolithic in nature doesn't feel right to me. This would seem to defy both the reference monitor requirement and the minimization/simplifcation as part of the B3 requirement in the orange book. I'm going to see if I can't hunt down the old TCSEC evaluation as they used to have more information than the CC ones. If anyone has an authroritative reference either way, I'd appreciate it. (Lots of un-authoritative ones claim either monolithic or microkernel.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.79.35 (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the idea of avoiding "advertisements" on the Wiki. I have tried to reword the initial XTS-400 content. Can you tell me what remainging content/wording seems too much like an advertisement?

Outdated link[edit]

The link given in the security section gives a 404 error. I have found what I believe to be the correct link, but I'd like this to be verified before added. If this is the correct link, feel free to update the page. Old link (which gives 404): http://niap.bahialab.com/cc-scheme/st/ST_VID3012a.cfm Link which I believe is correct: http://niap.bahialab.com/cc-scheme/st/?vid=3012 Rhussey84 18:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These links appear to have been corrected and updated. 72.73.20.252 (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EAL fact[edit]

"as of July 18, 2006, is the only general-purpose operating system with a Common Criteria assurance level rating of EAL5 or above."

I'm not sure if INTEGRITY-178B is considered a "general purpose" OS, but according to this article, it has been rated EAL6+. So if it is indeed appropriate, this claim should be updated. -Verdatum (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, INTEGRITY-178B is a real-time operating system. It targets a completely different protection profile, separation kernel protection profile (or SKPP). 72.73.20.252 (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link[edit]

The external URL to "Stop 7" is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.250.107 (talk) 19:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XTS-400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]