Talk:Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1992

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia

	Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1992 is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move to someplace[edit]

Calling it Serbia and Montenegro on the summary page is fine because of the description, but here it seems misleading since it was actually Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest according to the EBU. I don't however, believe that it should be added to the Yugoslavian templates. Should it be renamed Yugoslavia, but kept in the serbia and montenegro templates? y/n? comments? Grk1011 (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why, deep inside, did you change your opinion? And a quotation of EuroSong...

However, for the purposes of Eurovision participation, we count countries as individual entities according to which flag they entered with.
— EuroSong at Talk:ESC on 12^th of December 2007 (UTC), 00:52

Imbris (talk) 00:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice. It's always worth it to take a quote out of context... Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not out of context, and one can always click onto the wikilink and see. Stop making such remarks and try to comment by assuming good faith + try to act neutral (even if you are not inclined to the matter). -- Imbris (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]