Talk:Yvan Arpa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

worldtempus references[edit]

So I'm not entirely sure about the worldtempus references. Worldtempus does not appear in any of the WP:RSN archives, and it also is run by Edipresse. Edipresse has its own page, sure, but look at its history and go back to who created it. I'm not sure I trust the journalistic integrity of a media group that will create its own WP page. But we can go to RSN and discuss too, maybe others feel differently.

If there are other, reliable sources you can find though, have at it. -- UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 07:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Talkpage discussion of the reliability of added sources is good, reversion not so good (not least for the Edit conflict with my subsequent addition of a batch of newspaper sources). Anyway, as to the WorldTempus refs, I would not have been arguing that they were sufficient in themselves but could supplement reliable sources, and that in particular, whatever might be its overall reliability two were worth adding: (1) the legal settlement item, despite being a press release, and (2) the bylined article, the latter of which I therefore included in my post Edit Conflict batch of changes. (See also my summary opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvan Arpa.) AllyD (talk) 07:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]