Talk:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Needs serious rework.[edit]

Very far off from Wikipedia's nominal tone. 'Facts' makes the section appear a bit biased, etc, etc. OC39648 (talk) 20:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it needs a lot of work. Avocats (talk) 04:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Legal Decisions[edit]

The comment that this relies too heavily on primary sources is odd. In law, the primary source is everything. Avocats (talk) 04:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]