Talk:Zen Cart

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Archives

1

Mikkalai's notability problem[edit]

The case for Zen cart's notability has long been proved for several very specific reasons.

Mikkalai has repeatedly failed to recogonize it.

This wouldn't normally be a problem, but he appears to have some administrative powers he doesn't deserve. How do we correct that problem? How do we strip him of his powers over this article? Ace Frahm 04:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. The article text says not a single word about product's notability. Please also keep in mind that your last comment (as well as your texts of kind "Removing griefer message") may strip you from the rights of editing wikipedia. `'Míkka 20:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A note to occasional lookers-peepers: A am not not questioning notability of the subject (otherwise I'd rather put the {{afd}} note instead). The tag means that the article content is insufficient to conclude that the subject is notable. `'Míkka 20:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mikkalai: Then be bold. Or, if you just *have* to tag it, find a better tag. 70.62.164.12 (talk) 14:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tag is good: it explains in very detail what to do to make the article good. If the fans of the company don't care about the text, why me "to be bold"? `'Míkka >t 16:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see the citations of books about using ZenCart were sufficient to remove the removal warning banner. I would have thought the number of installed versions of software would be enough! Jlavezzo (talk) 14:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Zencart.jpg[edit]

Image:Zencart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.werwer

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]