Talk:Zeno Clash

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (15 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Improving the article[edit]

For an independent game, there are a lot of sources floating around online for the reception and development sections. I think we can bring it up a notch! I'll be working on this article for a while, and help is very much welcome. I'll dump some useful links here:

Zeno Clash blog, primary source with development notes
Rock, Paper, Shotgun, has a bunch of useful news stories like announce of DLC and so forth
Kotaku, same as above
Metacritic page, GameRankings page, for links to more reviews

Regards, BlazerKnight (talk) 02:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more citations and expanded on several sections. Hope to push for GA. I noticed a bunch of unformatted external links at cut it from the article. I'll eventually sift through them and see if they can be used as relevant citations. Feel free to help.
Media & News

BlazerKnight (talk) 06:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009-11-05 Assessment[edit]

~~The Reception section is really the only big thing here keeping this article from B-Class. Be sure you mention the aggregate scores in the prose of the section (it would be nice in the lead, too).~~

Check for spaces between the ending of a sentence or phrase and the start of a cite. Cites should always be as close to the text as possible

The Development section could use merging into three, or maybe even two paragraphs.

~~As the Post-release section is short in content, it may be best to combine sub-sections into one.~~

Overall a really nice read. Fix up those few little things and it's a easy B-Class, and well on it's way to becoming a GA. --Teancum (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping, Jade. Teancum, I believe I have addressed the last point - mentioning the aggregate scores in the lead and the reception section. I have taken the liberty of upgrading it to B class as your last edit seems to have intended. Thanks for reviewing! BlazerKnight (talk) 04:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]