This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
I've removed the section about performance, because I found the SU review in question[1] and it doesn't support the section claim at all. In fact, it sings Zeus' praises and claims it to be the best assembler of the three reviewed. Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article claims that Zeus was the first tokenising assembler (release 1983). But, both SynAssembler and Mac/65 preceded it (1982). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthonyball66 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
