Talk:Zhucheng

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zhucheng article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Zhucheng was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 31 December 2008.

Wikipedia

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs C‑class Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source is almost certainly wrong. How can we cite this?[edit]

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dinosaurs#Zhucheng:_Coelurus_is_probably_wrong.2C_yes.3F.
My problem with changing the genus names is that our source ( http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article5417059.ece ) says "ankylosaurus, tyrannosaurus and coelurus". If we change these, then we don't (currently) have a cite for this info.
Oh good God - now I see that they also say

Among the discoveries were that of the largest-known platypus, or “duck-billed dinosaur”, which measures 29.5ft high and has a wingspan wider than 52ft.

This must certainly be a contender for worst science reporting of 2008. -- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 03:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been reviewing the sources. There must be some translation issue. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 04:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zhucheng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080078322
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081123054153/http://www.zhucheng-youth.gov.cn/zcjj.htm to http://www.zhucheng-youth.gov.cn/zcjj.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]