Template:Did you know nominations/17 State Street

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

17 State Street

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

17 State Street

• ... that 17 State Street, near the southern end of New York City's Manhattan Island, was described as "quite literally a beacon for Lower Manhattan"? Source: Goldberger, Paul (July 17, 1988). "Architecture View; At 17 State Street, High Tech Passes Into the Vernacular". The New York Times.
  • ALT1: ... that 17 State Street replaced a 23-story building that existed for only 16 years? Source: White, Norval; Willensky, Elliot & Leadon, Fran (2010). AIA Guide to New York City (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 11.
  • ALT2: ... that the developer of 17 State Street agreed to exhibit historical artifacts as a penalty for destroying potential artifacts? Source: Dunlap, David W. (May 6, 1990). "Commercial Property: State Street Penitent; A Taste of the Past to Emend a Builder's Blunder". The New York Times
  • ALT3: ... that as a penalty for destroying potential artifacts on the site of 17 State Street, its developer agreed to exhibit historical artifacts next to that building? Source: Dunlap, David W. (May 6, 1990). "Commercial Property: State Street Penitent; A Taste of the Past to Emend a Builder's Blunder". The New York Times
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rockwood & Company shipping department fire

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 12:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC).

• @Epicgenius: Sufficiently expanded, well referenced, neutral, with no obvious copyvio. All of the suggested hooks are interesting and cited, and the image is appropriately licensed. Just waiting on a QPQ. 97198 (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
  • @97198: Thanks for the review. I have now done a QPQ. Epicgenius (talk) 12:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

• Good to go (any of the hooks). 97198 (talk) 12:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)