Template:Did you know nominations/1912 Brooklands Flanders Monoplane crash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by PumpkinSky talk 13:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

1912 Brooklands Flanders Monoplane crash[edit]

  • ... that the first report into an aviation accident was produced in June 1912?

Created/expanded by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 19:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

  • New article, all edits over about 3 days.
  • 1750 B of prose
  • Neutral tone, just lays out the facts
  • Inline citations employed
  • Source quality wise, there is a major newspaper, a govt website, and two sources listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Resources, so I assume their reliability.
  • Sources match article for most part, AGF on offline
  • I do not see any close paraphrasing
  • Hook is brief and interesting
  • I'm undecided about how the hook links to the article, but it seems okay

Remaining issues

  • QPQ necessary
  • Ref 1 does not explicitly mention model numbers (F.3 and D.4). This isn't a deal breaker, but if they could be sourced, it would be nice. Looking at the relevant Wikipedia articles, I agree that those should be the models by seating and horsepower, respectively.
As an aside, Chrome does not like ref 1, but IE8 handles it fine. Chris857 (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I missed a couple of things.
  • Looking at the report, is appears that the phrase should be in extenso, not in extensor
  • I'm not seeing where it is stated that this was the first air accident to be investigated. I see that it was the first in the UK, but is absolutely the first worldwide? Chris857 (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
  • It has been over two weeks since the above review was done, and notice was placed on the creator/nominator's talk page on the 15th and bumped on the 22nd. The author has been active on Wikipedia, just not here. There is an issue with the hook, and a QPQ has not been done. Given the complete lack of response, the article cannot be approved, and has been marked with the orange X icon. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)