Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Jim Beam strike

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

2016 Jim Beam strike

Improved to Good Article status by JJonahJackalope (talk). Self-nominated at 13:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC).

  • Hi JJonahJackalope, review follows: article promoted to GA on 28 December; article is cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources; I didn't find any issue with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me. One query, the background section notes that new employees were on $17.22 and then the "Course of the strike" section states "there would no longer be a two-tier wage system with some employees earning $17.22 per hour". I initially read that as some employees would now earn $17.22 an hour, but I guess it means that new employees would no longer be on the lower rate? Is there a way to clarify this? - Dumelow (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Dumelow, thanks for beginning this DYK review, I've made a slight edit to that section to clarify. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 03:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks JJonahJackalope, all good - Dumelow (talk) 07:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Promoting the main hook to Prep 1Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)