Template:Did you know nominations/Atmabodha Upanishad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by ceradon (talkcontribs) 14:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Atmabodha Upanishad[edit]

Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 09:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC).

@Nvvchar: Unless I'm seriously misreading it, the claim in the hook is not contained in the reference it links to. That reference only mentions Akasha and Buḍḍhi in a footnote without defining them, only Manas is actually defined. I'm not doubting they are correct, we just need another source. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Maury Markowitz, thanks for the review. Please check these ALTs.Redtigerxyz Talk 07:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes these definitely work. Prefer ALT1 personally. Final note: the lede says "It is a non-sectarian", which is not explained anywhere. You could add something in the body, but I'd suggest just adding an explanation of sectarian/non-sectarian texts there. Maury Markowitz (talk)
Thanks Maury Markowitz. Linked Samanya in lead which explains the meaning.--Redtigerxyz Talk 12:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)