Template:Did you know nominations/Australian paradox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 17:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Australian paradox[edit]

Created by Jinkinson (talk). Self nominated at 16:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Article new enough, long enough, fully referenced. Hook fine, verified against online source. Nominator has eight prior DYKs so QPQ required Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
I have done this, and have reviewed Boeing CQM-121 Pave Tiger. Jinkinson talk to me 01:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Good to go then! Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)