Template:Did you know nominations/Authoring Instructional Materials

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Authoring Instructional Materials[edit]

(

)

... that over 300,000 hours of training materials exist using the United States Navy's Authoring Instructional Materials management system?

Created by OhioTechie (talk). Self nominated at 05:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC).

This article appears to meet all of the DYK? criteria. Thus, I'd say that it is good to go right now. Futurist110 (talk) 01:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Returned from Prep 2. I think this hook needs to be worked on for clarity before using. Is this 300,000 hours of material existing within the AIM system or is it 300,000 hours of output from users of the AIM system? Or possibly there is not a difference, but the clunky contrived wording seems to imply there is. Spinning Spark 11:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

You're right that the wording needs improvement. How about "... that over 300,000 hours of training materials are developed and maintained using the United States Navy's Authoring Instructional Materials management system"?--OhioTechie (talk) 01:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

"are maintained" works but "are developed"? So you mean "have been developed"? Spinning Spark 10:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

"... that over 300,000 hours of training materials have been developed and are maintained using the United States Navy's Authoring Instructional Materials management system"? Would that work?--OhioTechie (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

for that last hook. Spinning Spark 07:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)