Template:Did you know nominations/Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha[edit]

Gautama Buddha

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Titodutta (talk) at 10:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC).

  • The article is very new, long enough, well cited, and without problems, and the image is public domain. What is cited is that Buddha suggested to his disciples to work for the welfare and happiness of the masses under this dictum (offine source accepted AGF). For Swami Vivekananda, what is cited is that he "spoke on this aphorism", stressed "welfare of the many, the happiness of the many" as a message for mankind, and provided an aesthetic vision... so in this hook "and Swami Vivekananda" is not cited; but I can approve it if the last three words are taken out. Moonraker (talk) 05:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I can not understand, stressed "welfare of the many, the happiness of the many" as a message for mankind — that is "Bahujana sukhayam bahujana hitaya". --TitoDutta 05:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I have added one more citation, I can add one more offline citation if needed. --TitoDutta 05:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I think we have a language problem here, Titodutta. To say "the Rigveda dictum Bahujana sukhaya bahujana hitaya cha... was suggested by... Swami Vivekananda" is contradicted. It seems it was suggested by Gautama Buddha, interpreted and promoted by Vivekananda. Moonraker (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Alt1 is just under 200 characters. It's a bit long but is otherwise fine. Moonraker (talk) 05:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)