Template:Did you know nominations/Baltimartyria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Baltimartyria[edit]

Baltimartyria rasnitsyni holotype

  • ... that the holotype (pictured) for the second species of Baltimartyria, an extinct moth, sat on the author's desk for a number of years?

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk), Ruigeroeland (talk). Nominated by Kevmin (talk) at 00:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T Suraj T


  • The hook would be better if the mention of author can be changed to something clearer. Suraj T 04:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure what it can be changed to as author and authority are the correct terms for the researcher that first describes a taxon. --Kevmin § 15:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I think many or most readers will wonder what a novelist has to do with an extinct moth, so a different way of phrasing the hook would be good. In addition, I think most people's reaction to the fact that it sat on someone's desk for a few years would be "so what?" -- the hook needs to specifiy something like: it sat on the author's desk for a number of years before he published a description of it to make any sense. BabelStone (talk) 00:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)