Template:Did you know nominations/Blake Martinez

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw^(talk) 03:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Blake Martinez

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Green Bay Packers rookie linebacker Blake Martinez was described as a "business-minded machine" at stopping running backs?

• Reviewed: James Nguyen

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Church (talk) and Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Nominated by Church (talk) at 05:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.
  • ✓ This biographical article has been expanded from 477 chars to 4149 chars since 23:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC), a 8.70-fold expansion
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4149 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • Note that this is a biographical article about a living person. All claims must be cited to a reliable source.
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (5.7% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 123 characters
  • ✓ Church has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/James Nguyen was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

• This article does not qualify as a 2x BLP because it had several sources before expansion began. However, it does qualify as a 5x expansion. Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Apologies, I must have put the wrong tag on when I created the article. Regards--Church ^Talk 22:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

• This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook fact has an inline citation, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)