Template:Did you know nominations/Bristol High Cross

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 15:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Bristol High Cross[edit]

The original Bristol High Cross is now at Stourhead

Created/expanded by Andrew Davidson (talk). Self nom at 12:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

This new article has sufficient length, and was posted here within the time scale. The hook is nice and direct, at 82 characters. Material is supported by inline referencing throughout (the reference supplied for the hook uses a common alternative spelling of "Scroop"—this is completely acceptable). The image for the hook is free-licence, but does the status of File:Edward III from Bristol High Cross at BL.jpg need to be clarified? If I am interpreting the policy correctly (not a given) at present it is submitted as {{PD-old}}, but it is dated 16 January 2012. Photographs of three-dimensional objects almost always generate a new copyright, so all that would be required is for the poster/copyright holder, who seems to be the creator of the article, to attach a free licence to his image. Otherwise, all looks good, and a nice contribution!--Old Moonraker (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

  • I have amended the licensing as you suggest. Andrew Davidson (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix. Happy to send this on its way! --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm unable to find the sentence that says "Lord High Treasurer" and wondering if this should be left off the hook. --PFHLai (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
  • That's what gives the hook its bite! Reference fixed. --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)