Template:Did you know nominations/Cakalang fufu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Schwede66 03:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Cakalang fufu[edit]

Cakalang fufu

Created/expanded by Gunkarta (talk). Nominated by Annas86 (talk) at 09:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Second half of the article is unreferenced. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Done! added more references.Gunkarta (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Too short; doesn't meet the 1500 bytes of prose requirement. Schwede66 19:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Stub Class articles are not eligible for DYK. Maile66 (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
  • The article is now six days old, but hasn't been expanded to meet the minimum length requirement. It would now need a five times expansion, but since most of the content got created with the very first edit, that will be a very steep ask. So we'll have to fail this - sorry. Schwede66 21:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm not entirely sure that's a valid reason for failing an article; I've seen many DYK vets get longer than that to bring their new articles past the 1500 character limit, as long as they submit it within the first five days. However, there is some unacceptably close paraphrasing of at least one source that I could see. I'm also dubious about whether that source, IndonesiaCultures.com, the only one in English, could be considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I question the reliability of Cyber Sulut, Manadobisnis.com, Dyah A. Dhyani's blog, and Indonesiaculture.com. The others are newspapers, and generally pretty good quality. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
  • The close paraphrasing issues were not addressed in the 11 June edits, and no edits have been made to address the sourcing concerns since Crisco 1492's comments. BlueMoonset (talk) 10:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC)