Template:Did you know nominations/Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Schwede66 talk 03:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum

  • ... that the curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum were responsible for the upkeep of public works and buildings in ancient Rome? Source: Robinson, O. F. (2003-08-27). Ancient Rome: City Planning and Administration. Routledge. p. 46. ISBN 978-1-134-84494-4.

Created by Graearms (talk). Self-nominated at 02:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Curatores aedium sacrarum et operum locorumque publicorum; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • New enough, long enough, fine sourcing, no copyvio. The page cited does not verify the "temples" part of the hook. I'm sure "public temples" is true, but why not just say "public works and public buildings"? @Graearms: The most important thing I learned from looking up p. 46 in Robinson is that August created a new office for maintenance as distinct from new builds and major restorations. Perhaps there is a better hook there? Srnec (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  • @Graearms: Can you address the above? I'll also leave a notification on your talk page so ensure that you see this. Z1720 (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
  • @Z1720:@Srnec: I edited the hook to include your proposed change. I am unsure if another hook would be necessary, I thought this hook would be interesting due to the unusually long name.Graearms (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Srnec (talk) 23:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC)