Template:Did you know nominations/Dahlgren Chapel of the Sacred Heart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Dahlgren Chapel of the Sacred Heart[edit]

Rear view of Dahlgren Chapel
Rear view of Dahlgren Chapel


Created/expanded by Ergo Sum (talk). Nominated by Patrickneil (talk) at 14:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Long enough, maintains neutrality and posted by due date. Hook is interesting and its reference verified. No copy vio noted. QPQ done. Img is freely licensed.--Nvvchar. 08:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Only issue I see is that the image does not appear in the article. Ergo Sum 20:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
A church in a courtyard.
Infobox image
The red brick facade of a church.
Another option
  • If a DYK regular can chime in here, I'm not sure that's actually mandatory, I think its just that the image "should" be on the page. I went with the one above because at 100px, the church in the current photo from the infobox (top right) gets a little lost at that scale. I might also suggest this photo (bottom right), which might work well as the infobox image and still read well at 100px. We also don't have to have a photo with the nomination, that's an option.-- Patrick, oѺ 21:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Admittedly, I am not a DYK regular. I just interpreted the guideline as suggesting a photo present in the article was required. I may be mistaken. Ergo Sum 03:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
  • I recently added an image gallery to the Dahlgren Chapel article that contains several images, one of which is the image that is associated with this nomination. There should be no persistent problem. Ergo Sum 03:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC)