Template:Did you know nominations/Djenar Maesa Ayu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 22:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Djenar Maesa Ayu[edit]

  • ... that Djenar Maesa Ayu was involved with 1 Woman, 14 Men on her 38th birthday?
  • Comment: This article was created as part of the Wikimedia Indonesia - Lontar collaboration. Any constructive feedback is welcome.

Created/expanded by WL5Joy (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 00:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Article has not been expanded 5x since it was created. Hook content seems wrong, means vary as written in the article. aηsuмaη ༽Ϟ 19:37, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
It was created on 20 October, which is within 5 days of nomination (i.e. new enough for DYK). What do you mean by "means vary as written in the article"? Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
I mean the hook says she was involved with 1 woman, 14 men, but she(1 woman) collaborated with 14 men and published the work on her birthday. So the hook need to be changed. aηsuмaη ༽Ϟ 04:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • The name of the short story collection is...? And was she involved in an activity related to it on her birthday? Even the translation of the title is cited. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Hook fact is verified. Article checks out for length and newness. Article has sufficient citations. Hook length and interest level are OK. However, I find too much similarity in the wording of the article and its sources. See this comparison from duplication detector. The article also has some wording that is very close to this source. --Orlady (talk) 03:17, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
  • I will contact the editor. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:48, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Paraphrasing should be better now. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
  • I agree. Everything is good now! --Orlady (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)