Template:Did you know nominations/Eufriesea purpurata

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Eufriesea purpurata

(

)

Eufriesea purpurata

... that a malaria control program in rural Brazil attracted droves of annoying, colorful bees who collect pesticide (pictured) into people's homes? Source: "100% responded that there had been no house-visiting bees until the malaria control spray programme was begun. ... Noise produced by bee activity ... was a notable disturbance to 76% of the families interviewed" - https://www.nature.com/articles/297062a0
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Samoa House

Created by Zanahary (talk). Self-nominated at 06:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Eufriesea purpurata; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Article is new enough and long enough. I wonder if a shorter hook about these bees collecting pesticides might be possible. AGFing on the first two sources and #8. Where does #4 say "strong"? I am not sure that we should infer "95% reported disturbance" from "5% of the interviewed had no issue". Where does the 2mg and 4% number come from? No copyvio or plagiarism that I can see. Hook is mostly supported by the sauces, except the "colorful" bit. QPQ is a bit basic. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Removed "strong". The article reports two levels of disturbance: one with 19%, and one with 76%. I think this can reasonably be reported as 95% reporting some annoyance. I'm not sure what you mean about the QPQ—is there something that should be changed? Zanahary (talk) 11:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

A few comments on how the other criteria were assessed would be nice. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok, did so! This is my fifth nomination by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanahary (talk • contribs)

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)